October 29, 2014:
Post Modernism Dilemma in the 20th Century
So many “isms” – these isms categorize and organize historical information neatly and, unfortunately, sometimes turning off many otherwise inquiring minds. We all learned in school about the industrial revolution and the modern movement that spun out of control after World War I and the new philosophies that advanced past 17th century Western Enlightenment’s notions of reforming society though reason while challenging ideas based on tradition and faith, and to advance by imposing scientific thought, skepticism, and intellectual interchange.
Modernism is seen as a socially progressive trend of
thought that affirms the power of human beings to create, improve and reshape
their environment with the aid of practical experimentation, scientific
knowledge, or technology. Modernists in
the 20th century believed the traditional forms of art,
architecture, literature, religious faith, philosophy, social organization, and
activities of daily life were becoming outdated in the new economic, social,
and political environment of an emerging fully industrialized world.
Criticizing an obsolete culture of the past the motto "Make it new!"
was the modernists’ movement's approach to what was now.
20th century Modernism tends to be
self-consciousness, leading to experiments with form – the movement explicitly
rejected the ideology of realism. The elements of Modernism which accentuated the benefits of
rationality and socio-technological progress were being challenged. For example
the International Style, emerging in the 1920s and
1930s, the formative decades of modern architecture, reflected the modern movement --rectilinear forms; surfaces that have been completely stripped of
applied ornamentation and decoration -- glass and steel, in combination with
usually less visible reinforced concrete. Particularly after World War Two, the
International Style provided the International Style emerged largely as a
result of a strong desire to create a "modern" style of architecture
for "modern man". This underlined the need for a neutral, functional
style, without any of the decorative features of period styles such as
Romanesque, Gothic, or Renaissance architecture, all of which were
old-fashioned, if not obsolete.
No comments:
Post a Comment